![]() ![]() The details: The i525’s maraging steel face is strong enough to allow for a thinner face structure whose variable face thickness (VFT) increases ball speed for more distance-and more consistent distances. Combined with polymer inserts, these clubs should provide better sound and feel throughout the bag. Yet with this still came high praise for the i59’s forgiveness and high launch from such a small package.īrand new face technology increases speed, distance and control in these new irons. The compact head appealed to the players-club set, as did the warm feel-“You can feel the ball compress,” gushed that tester. “It has a stellar look at address-clean, not too small, but small enough that I can work it, with just the right amount of offset.” Others echoed the best-of-both-worlds theme, praising form and function in equal measure. Our take: Did our testers like the look of the i59s more, or the performance? Yes. Which is to say, they’re irons that offer many of the benefits of the metalwoods from which they in part arose. G425s employ variable face thickness (VFT)-the face is thinner in certain areas, and the weight saved has been added to the hosel and toe, enhancing forgiveness, ball speed and shot trajectory. The details: Rather than stay stuck in their silos, Ping engineers borrowed from the face design of the company’s drivers and fairway woods to get the performance attributes they wanted in these irons. As such, they now use variable face thickness (VFT), which means the face is thinner in certain areas to increase speed. To improve speed and height on its G425 irons, Ping took notes from the face design of its successful drivers and fairways. “I’m finding the face with regularity,” said one, “and they’re more forgiving than what I’m used to getting.” While game-improvement irons can sometimes fall short on the sensory side of the equation, GOLF testers praised the G425’s feel and sound. Testers gave these tech-packed clubs a happy thumbs-up on both fronts. Our take: For players looking first and foremost for higher launches and more distance from their irons, Ping’s G425s stand front and center. For added forgiveness for those who most need it, the G710s also sport tungsten weights in both the heel and toe, too. The details: To make the longest and most forgiving irons among its wide-ranging lineup-a fact duly noted by our testers-Ping merged maraging steel faces with 17-4 stainless-steel bodies that act as least as much like metalwoods as irons. Robot’s take: A ball speed and carry leader in the category, producing higher flight and negating unwanted spin.By combining a stainless steel body, maraging steel face, and tungsten toe and shaft weights, Ping G710 irons become their longest, most forgiving irons with metalwood-like flexibility, explosive speed, and incredibly stability. Don’t usually see those two things together.” The Blueprint is the definition of a modern-day blade.ĬlubTester’s take (2-hdcp): “Small profile, but I watched the ball rocket off the face. Even for a scratch golfer, getting a few more yards is a welcome sight when you’re going toe to toe with players who are using better-player products. The beauty of these irons is how effortlessly they blend the DNA of a muscleback with the power of a better-player iron. And did we mention the intricate four-step, multistage process? The Blueprint may be a one-piece forging, but more than 50 steps are required during manufacturing, including machining the face and grooves. A machined tungsten screw in the toe gives the head a slight bump in heel-toe forgiveness over the traditional version. Forged from 8620 carbon steel, the iron boasts reduced offset and a shorter blade length than PING’s iBlade. Only this isn’t the version your dad grew up with. Which brings us to PING’s Blueprint, a blade that certainly looks the part. You’re giving up all of the comforts that come with a larger profile for something that works the ball on command and hits a certain yardage with regularity. Our take: Muscleback blades are supposed to be butter-knife thin and lack the forgiveness and distance typically found in a better-player cavity-back. You can find the full list of irons and test results here. Below are the results for the Ping Blueprint irons. For the second installment of ClubTest 2020, we tested and reviewed 57 new iron models to help you find the right one for your game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |